Posts Tagged ‘ISO-14971’

New ISO/TR 15499 standard available on Biological evaluation of medical devices — Guidance on the conduct of biological evaluation within a risk management process

Friday, August 3rd, 2012

ISO/TR 15499:2012, “Biological evaluation of medical devices — Guidance on the conduct of biological evaluation within a risk management process,” has just been released and is now available from Document Center Inc.  The new Technical Report provides guidance on conduct of biological evaluation of medical devices according to the requirements of ISO 10993-1.

This document can be used to better understand the requirements of ISO 10993-1 and to illustrate some of the variety of methods and approaches available for meeting the requirements of ISO 10993-1.  Biological evaluation is a design verification activity which is set in the context of broader risk management processes. This means ISO/TR 15499 includes guidance on the application of ISO 10993-1 in the context of risk management processes conducted according to the requirements of ISO 14971.

Guidance contained in this Technical Report can also be useful as background information for those representing risk management process assessors, conformity assessment bodies and regulatory enforcement bodies.

ISO standards are sold by Document Center Inc. under license agreement at our webstore, www.document-center.com.  Or contact us by phone (650-591-7600), fax (650-591-7617) or email (info@document-center.com).  We can assist you with the standards questions and requirements that affect your business.

ISO 15223 Series on Medical devices — Symbols to be used with medical device labels, labelling and information to be supplied

Wednesday, January 4th, 2012

ISO 15223 has been around since 1998, but in 2007 it was split into 2 parts covering two distinct topics.  We often sell this set here at Document Center Inc. so I thought you might appreciate a brief synopsis of the two documents.

ISO 15223-1:2007 is titled “Medical devices — Symbols to be used with medical device labels, labelling and information to be supplied — Part 1: General requirements.”  Note the English spelling for labeling.  All ISO standards are published using the English spelling, not the American.  The standard is not complete without Amendment 1, ISO 15223-1:2007/Amd 1:2008.  So be sure to order both items when you purchase the standard.

ISO 15223-1:2007 identifies requirements for the development and use of symbols that may be used to convey information on the safe and effective use of medical devices. It also lists symbols that satisfy it’s requirements.

ISO 15223-1:2007 is limited to symbols applicable to a broad spectrum of devices that may be marketed globally. These symbols may be used on the device itself or its package or in the associated documentation.

ISO 15223-2:2010, titled “Medical devices — Symbols to be used with medical device labels, labelling, and information to be supplied — Part 2: Symbol development, selection and validation,” specifies a process for developing, selecting and validating symbols for inclusion in ISO 15223-1.

The purpose of ISO 15223-2 is to ensure that symbols included in ISO 15223-1 are readily understood by the target group.

If the symbol validation process detailed in ISO 15223-2:2010 has been complied with, then the residual risks, as defined in ISO 14971 and IEC 62366, associated with the usability of a medical device symbol are presumed to be acceptable, unless there is objective evidence to the contrary.

ISO 15223-2:2010 is not restricted to symbols intended to meet regulatory requirements or specified in regulatory guidelines on labelling.

These standards, and all ISO and IEC documents, are available from Document Center Inc. at our website, www.document-center.com.  Or contact us by phone (650-591-7600), fax (650-591-7617) or email (info@document-center.com).  We’re happy to answer any questions you may have about these publications.

There’s a new standard EP23 available for Laboratory Quality Control Based on Risk Management

Friday, November 4th, 2011

CLSI has released a new standard, EP23, titled “Laboratory Quality Control Based on Risk Management; Approved Guideline.”  The document, available through Document Center Inc., provides guidance based on risk management for laboratories to develop quality control plans tailored to the particular combination of measuring system, laboratory setting, and clinical application of the test.

CLSI, formerly known as NCCLS, is a global, nonprofit, standards-developing organization that promotes the development and use of voluntary consensus standards and guidelines within the health care community.

The new guideline EP23 compliments the ISO 14971, “Medical devices — Application of risk management to medical devices,” ISO 10993-1, “Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process,” and ISO 20993, “Biological evaluation of medical devices — Guidance on a risk-management process.”  It shows the increasing emphasis on risk management as a component of quality control in the health care industry.

All standards mentioned can be purchased from Document Center Inc. through our website, www.document-center.com.  Or contact us by phone (650-591-7600), fax (650-591-7617) or email (info@document-center.com).  We can assist you in the challenge of compiling and maintaining your standards documentation.

Human Factors for Medical Devices – IEC 62366 and ANSI/AAMI HE75

Thursday, April 7th, 2011

Do you need help in finding the best practices guidance in medical device human factors engineering?  With the focus of good design being expanded to the entire product life cycle, the issue of insuring adequate medical device usability has taken on new importance.  Here at Document Center Inc. our customers have been relying on two standards for this – ANSI/AAMI 75 and IEC 62366.

Human Factors Engineering (HFE) is a new and separate discipline within the medical device industry. It has evolved due to the high concentration of medical device incident reports and recalls involving use error.  HFE includes all aspects of a device that users interact with when operating the product.  It considers the interaction with the device by operators, maintainers, cleaners, caregivers, and patients.  By providing adequate labeling, instruction, and ease of use, manufacturers can reduce use-associated risk.

IEC 62366 Edition 1.0 from 2007, “Medical devices – Application of usability engineering to medical devices,” focuses on the process of analysis, evaluation, and testing methods for developing safe and usable medical devices.  It aims to improve usability by reducing design-induced error.  Simply stated, IEC 62366 covers human factors design process — what needs to be done and when.

One important aspect in using the standard is the presumption of reduction of risk as defined in ISO 14971.  If the usability engineering process detailed in the standard and the acceptance criteria documented in the usability validation plan have both been met, then the residual risks associated with usability of a medical device are considered to be acceptable, unless there is objective evidence to the contrary.

It is my understanding that if you already meet the IEC 60601-1-6, you have most of the requirements of the IEC 62366 already achieved.  The document has been adopted for use in Europe as EN 62366: 2008.

ANSI/AAMI HE75-2009, “Human Factors Engineering—Design of Medical Devices,” covers the principles of HFE.  The standard provides detailed human factors engineering design guidance, examples, checklists, and case studies. With 445 pages, and extensive illustrations, it is considered an encyclopedia of HFE for specific situations.  It covers all aspect of design, from basic human skills and abilities to post-market issues.  The standard is a powerful tool in all stages of the design life cycle.

These standards can all be purchased from Document Center Inc. at our website, www.document-center.com.  Or contact us by phone (650-591-7600), fax (650-591-7617) or email (info@document-center.com).  As always, questions and comments are welcome.

New BS EN ISO 14971 Medical devices. Application of risk management to medical devices Corregendum 1 for 2009 Edition

Friday, February 18th, 2011

BS EN ISO 14971:2009 has been reissued with a new Corrigendum 1 as of February 2011.  The document is titled “Medical devices. Application of risk management to medical devices.”  It’s available for purchase from Document Center Inc.

The EN Corrigenda are corrections that are interfiled directly into the standard they modify.  For example, the Corrigendum 1 for  the BS EN ISO 14971:2009 corrects the pagination of the document.  So, there is no page within the document that describes the change.  It is just included by correcting the way the pages are numbered.

The EN ISO 14971 is a major European medical devices standard.  The BS EN ISO 14971 is the official English language edition.  It continues to adopt the ISO-14971:2007 Edition.

The standard specifies a process for a manufacturer to identify the hazards associated with medical devices, including in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical devices, to estimate and evaluate the associated risks, to control these risks, and to monitor the effectiveness of the controls.

The requirements of ISO 14971:2007 and its various adoptions are applicable to all stages of the life-cycle of a medical device.

The EN ISO 14971 is one of the “harmonised” standards for the Medical Devices Directive (93/42/eec), which means that by meeting the requirements of the standard there is the presumption of conformity with the essential requirements of the directive.

Both ISO 14971 and BS EN ISO 14971 are available for purchase from Document Center Inc.  Check out our website at www.document-center.com or send us an email at info@document-center.com, phone us at 650-591-7600 or send a fax to 650-591-7617.  We’re happy to help you with all your Standards Requirements.

Advice from the Pros regarding the use of ISO and EN-ISO standards for certification

Wednesday, September 29th, 2010

I recently sent emails to a number of quality professionals asking the question: Is the use of the equivalent ISO document acceptable in  the place of the EN-ISO adoption of the same standard?

I got back a wide variety of responses and am culling the best suggestions here for you!

As one consultant put it, “The bottom line [is that it] will ultimately be a decision made by the registrar.”   Or, as another expert wrote, “The only issue would be if the Notified Body is BSI… they may ‘prefer’ the client using the BS[-EN version].”

However, there was a response from a Regulatory Compliance Specialist who works for a major international medical devices company that did provide a rationale for the use of the EN documentation, and a suggestion on how to keep from having to purchase multiple copies of the same material.

He notes that auditors will require the use of the EN editions because they are specifically called out in the supporting harmonised lists for specific directives.  However, he has found that the original source documents can be substituted if the organization being registered will take the time to do the following steps:

1.  Provide a reason for choosing a different document than the EN Edition.

2.  Provide written justification that the ISO documents are identical to the EN adoptions.   (Document Center Inc. can provide you with documentation that this is so.)

3.  For those EN adoptions that have a conflicting date due to the addition of the annexes, provide documentation that shows that the differences do not affect your product.  (Again, Document Center Inc. can help you with this.)

I also asked if there were other jurisdictions that presented similar documentation issues.  Here’s some of the  feedback:

1.  Canada – Note that CSA has lists of recognized standards, similar to the lists issued by the EU.  However, they not only list the CSA National publications but also the source ISO documents when applicable — they are more flexible in their published approach.

2.  There are countries like Japan and China that will not recognize certain ISO standards.

3.  Certification in the U.S. is more flexible than EU certification, with more acceptance of the various national adoptions.

And in a phone conversion, it was pointed out that an EN standard with the same number as an ISO document, but without the ISO as part of the number, is not an equivalent standard.  So the above suggestions for gaining acceptance of the ISO original for EN certification will only apply to EN documents that are identical.

All comments will be appreciated.  And if you’d like to get in touch directly, contact us at info@document-center.com, to my attention, Claudia Bach.

ISO-14971 – A guide to the document and it’s many reprints

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

ISO-14971:2007,  Medical devices — Application of risk management to medical devices, is a critical component to any medical device manufacturers core standards collection. However, many users get confused by the many adoptions and reprints of this standard.

According to ISO, the document itself “specifies a process for a manufacturer to identify the hazards associated with medical devices, including in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical devices, to estimate and evaluate the associated risks, to control these risks, and to monitor the effectiveness of the controls.”

It is an integral part of the Medical Device Quality Management System outlined by ISO-13485, Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes.

But the fact that the document is essential to a Medical Devices Quality system has meant that the document has been adopted and reprinted the world over.  The existence of many documents with “ISO-14971″ in the document number but with differing dates makes choosing the right document difficult for some.

The reason for the many adoptions is the very popularity of the document itself.  For example, the European union has a scheme in place (harmonized standards) so that the requirements of legislation translate into regulation based on EN standards.   These standards have been produced under a mandate from the European Commission and adopted by Member States under the “New Approach” Directive.  And the EU is partial to the use of ISO standards whenever possible.

When legislation requires risk management to be adopted by companies selling medical devices in Europe, the use of the ISO-14971 is promptly identified as the standard to use.  However, the administrative process requires the ISO document to be adopted by the EU as an EN standard and then made publicly available as adoptions by the various countries of the EU as they are being put into use.  The BS-EN-ISO-14971 is the official English language edition, DIN-EN-ISO-14971 is the official German language edition, and so on.

Unfortunately, administrative activities have caused the issuance of 2009 Editions of the EN adoptions, out of sync with the current 2007 Edition of the ISO source document.  Customers do not realize that the ISO itself is stable in both the EN-14971:2007 and EN-14971:2009 Editions.  Only the administrative EN information has changed.

Another factor in the widespread reissuing of this document is the fact that when a country participates in the development of an ISO standard, they receive the right to reprint the standard in a national translation.  So, because AAMI is the U.S. “tag” (participant) for this committee, we have an American release of this standard, ANSI/AAMI/ISO-14971 2007 Edition.  The document has administrative information particular to the U.S. in the opening pages, much like the EN adoption.   Then the ISO edition is reprinted verbatim, except where English spelling conventions have been translated into the U.S. format (like “colour” vs. “color”).

You will find similar adoptions in Canada, Russia, Japan, and so on.

Our only comment to our customers is that the higher up the food chain you go, the “fresher” your information will be.  That is, the source document, ISO-14971, changes first and is released first.  Then each organization that issues a reprint of the item must go through the administrative formalities of adopting the new information.

However, many times the national translations of the ISO documents can be less expensive than the source material.  So if cost is a concern, you may want to check out the AAMI/ISO edition of the 14971.

Of course, to purchase ISO-14971 or the other documents mentioned above, they’re available from Document Center Inc. at www.document-center.com, info@document-center.com, and by phone at +650-591-7600 or fax at +650-591-7617.